lichess.org
Donate

I have an Opinion about Hans Niemann

NiC 4/2022 (a couple of months ago):

"Niemann rarely gets into time-trouble and is highly inventive in both good and, even more importantly, bad positions."
Niemann's IQ is very high.... that's why he won against Aronian! (He used artificial intelligence)
This absolutely proves Niemann is a cheater. Never before have I seen any post better at proving Niemann a cheater. Absolutely breathtaking. However, I would suggest you add the correlation between Lewis Hamilton's hair length and Niemann's rating. Otherwise, perfect.
But there were no official accusations :) - what about the movies you have watched? What comes "out" of these movies? Is it a clean knowledge (clean as in clean energy)?

My personal opinion is that if he couldnt explain the knight sac for a pawn then... he is lost. I think in Sinquefield they already scanned if he was absorbing anything into his antennae and the correlation will come out soon :) - the metrology hardware for 10k $ will always beat a bead for 100$ each :)

In Poland we had a case of Ms Patrycja (underage) everybody was suspecting her but nobody wanted to speak about it and finally some judge asked if she has some mobile phone with her, is this turned on and she was disqualified no matter what her chess moves were speaking about her.
I'm not so sure..

Norwegians adoption of electric vehicles can explain the correlation between carbon efficiency and the rise of Niemann's rating. Meanwhile, Domino's stock has been shooting through the roof due to innovative business practices like introducing the cinnamon, mozzarella, and pepperoni filled brownie stick. Their subsidiary Le Domino's is probably responsible for the rise of France's GDP over that same timeframe so that plot is also on thin ice. In my opinion, the only significant unexplained correlation here is the inverse relationship with the Baltimore Orioles attendance numbers. But that could be related to them not having Mike Trout.

I remain unconvinced. Hans is a fine young man and we drag his good name through the mud for our clickbait, it is sad.
Someone might be a little color blind by looking at those graphs LMAO!
The article in NiC was not outrageous. In the light of the actual circumstances it reads a bit strange.