lichess.org
Donate

Super GMs are a disgrace to the chess world

@Ben10Tenyson
I didn't focus on Magnus, I said that if you see stats then you will see that number of moves (x-axis) vs draws in chess history over time (y-axis) somewhat kind of hyperbola which justifies my statement. Let me find that source where I had seen it once.
@Akbar2thegreat said in #51:
> @Ben10Tenyson
> I didn't focus on Magnus, I said that if you see stats then you will see that number of moves (x-axis) vs draws in chess history over time (y-axis) somewhat kind of hyperbola which justifies my statement. Let me find that source where I had seen it once.
I Ageee that players nowadays draw lot more But i Completely bealive that magnus doesnt make lots of draws as you had claimed here And he tries to win most of timr@Akbar2thegreat said in #18:
> Are you high?
> Well, in today's era players just do draws and draws with agreement. No proper and original play occurs. Carlsen and others are just scared of losing rating points hence all of them just offer draw. Had Carlsen did not offer/accept draw, then he certainly wouldn't be number 1. The players just don't want to lose their position. This era is so poor.
@Ben10Tenyson
Yes, but many wrongly say that Carlsen was number 1 in 2013 and still number 1 in 2022. They don't realise that Carlsen was beast in 2013 and had his peak then.
I mean if we plot ranks of players over time in comparison to their peak forms, then current rankings would not see Carlsen as number 1.
Hope you understood what I mean.
Nevertheless, I have already explained my major motto of debating on this topic in previous post.
akbar notjust that post about the crazyhouse thing. you keep insulting everybody INCLUDING CARLSEN!!!! what im saying is that u need to shut your face and look at the actual gms to find inspiration. not be overconfident about yourself. you would lose in 5 min
@Akbar2thegreat are you ok? bro carlsen had a higher rating because its harder nowdays since chess is changing. Also you would lo,se easily to Carlsne, you cannot even beat him ur nowhere close
@narayan0811 @AmazingActor22
I never said that I can beat GMs like Carlsen. Did I?
I am not demeaning anyone, just telling draw rates have increased over period of time in chess history.
I also told that peak of Carlsen was in 2013. High rating doesn't necessarily mean that player is strong but performance (not performance rating) matters. And everyone agrees that Carlsen was a beast/freak in 2013 in context of playing chess.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.