@Sicilian67 said in #42:
> risus abundat in ore stultorum
@Sicilian67 said in #42:
> by looking at your ELO here, it's clear why you both make so much blabla keyboard activity, because you can't make ELO raising activity...
It's important to remember that someone's Elo rating, which is commonly used in chess to measure player strength, doesn't necessarily correlate with their ability to contribute meaningfully in discussions or other activities. Elo ratings are specific to chess and are not indicative of a person's intelligence, creativity, or capability in other domains.
Critiquing someone's contributions based solely on their Elo rating is unfair and unfounded. People engage in discussions for various reasons, and their value isn't solely determined by numerical metrics like Elo ratings. It's more productive to evaluate individuals based on the quality of their contributions and their willingness to engage constructively, rather than making assumptions based on unrelated metrics.
With thanks to Chat GPT. I wouldn't have expressed it so well myself.